UDC

612.76:616-053.35

DOI

10.17238/issn2542-1298.2019.7.3.290

Authors

Evgeniya A. Tomilova*, Svetlana N. Gordiychuk*
*Tyumen State Medical University (Tyumen, Russian Federation)
Corresponding author: Evgeniya Tomilova, address: ul. Odesskaya 54, Tyumen, 625023, Russian Federation; e-mail: tomilovaea@mail.ru

Abstract

All physiological functions in the body one way or another relate to its size; some of them, however, change in the course of ontogenesis in proportion to weight changes. Indicators of physical development of a newborn child are quite variable. For example, variability of body mass indicators can be explained by a number of reasons: physiological weight loss in the early and gain in weight and height in the late neonatal period. Currently, a quantitative assessment of human physical development is performed using specially developed standards, i.e. centile tables, which are the results of an anthropometric survey of large groups of the population. Given that growth and development processes are influenced by various external factors, these standards should be updated regularly. Thus, developmental physiology and paediatrics require studying anthropometric indicators at different stages of ontogenesis, with new individual typological approaches growing in importance. The methodological basis of this research is the concept of typological variability of physiological individuality (V.V. Kolpakov and coauthors). Longitudinal studies have proven that the level of habitual motor activity is a stable individual characteristic in both males and females at different stages of ontogenesis: preschool, primary school, young, middle and old age. We applied Kolpakov’s concept to study spontaneous motor activity and establish individual typological features of anthropometric indicators in newborn children of the city of Tyumen (n = 137). The research confirmed that the physical development of newborns directly correlates with the level of their spontaneous motor activity. Therefore, this individual typological characteristic should be taken into account when assessing anthropometric indicators of newborns.

Keywords

spontaneous physical activity, newborns, physical development, anthropometry

References

1. Baranov A.A., Al’bitskiy V.Yu. Sostoyanie zdorov’ya detey Rossii, prioritety ego sokhraneniya i ukrepleniya [State of Health of Children in Russia, Priorities of Its Preservation and Improving]. Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2018, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 698–705. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2018-698
2. Bezrukikh M.M. Metodologicheskie podkhody k probleme vozrastnogo razvitiya [Methodological Approaches to the Problem of Age Development]. Baranov A.A., Shcheplyagina L.A. (eds.). Fiziologiya rosta i razvitiya detey i podrostkov (teoreticheskie i klinicheskie voprosy) [Physiology of Growth and Development of Children and Adolescents (Theoretical and Clinical Issues)]. Moscow, 2006. Vol. 1, pp. 39–67.
3. Kuchma V.R., Skoblina N.A. Sovremennye problemy otsenki fizicheskogo razvitiya detey v sisteme meditsinskoy profilaktiki [Current Problems of the Evaluation of Children’s Physical Development in Preventive Healthcare]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk, 2009, no. 5, pp. 19–21.
4. Doskin V.A., Makarova Z.S. Mnogofaktornaya otsenka sostoyaniya zdorov’ya detey rannego vozrasta [Multifactorial Evaluation of the Health Status of Infants]. Rossiyskiy vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii, 2006, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 30–37.
5. Kil’diyarova R.R. Otsenka fizicheskogo razvitiya detey s pomoshch’yu pertsentil’nykh diagramm [Assessing Physical Development of Children with Percentile Diagrams]. Voprosy sovremennoy pediatrii, 2017, no. 16, pp. 431–437. DOI: 10.15690/vsp.v16i5.1808
6. Arshavskiy I.A. Fiziologicheskie mekhanizmy i zakonomernosti individual’nogo razvitiya. Osnovy negentropiynoy teorii ontogeneza [Physiological Mechanisms and Patterns of Individual Development. Fundamentals of the Negentropic Theory of Ontogenesis]. Moscow, 1982. 270 p.
7. Farber D.A., Bezrukikh M.M. Methodological Aspects of Studies of the Physiology of Child Development. Hum. Physiol., 2001, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 515–522.
8. Son’kin V.D., Tambovtseva R.V. Razvitie myshechnoy energetiki i rabotosposobnosti v ontogeneze [Development of Muscle Energy and Capacity for Work in Ontogenesis]. Moscow, 2011. 368 p.
9. Krivoshchekov S.G., Mozolevskaya N.V. Individual’no-tipologicheskie osobennosti morfofunktsional’nogo razvitiya i povedeniya mladshikh shkol’nikov [Individual and Typological Features of Morphofunctional Development and Behaviour Among Primary School Children]. Byulteten’ SO RAMN, 2007, no. 3, pp. 150–158.
10. Lar’kina N.Yu., Tomilova E.A., Kolpakov V.V., Bespalova T.V. Individual’no-tipologicheskie razlichiya pokazateley agressivnosti i depressii u mladshikh shkol’nikov s razlichnym urovnem privychnoy dvigatel’noy aktivnosti [Individual and Typological Differences in Indicators of Aggression and Depression in Primary School Children with Different Levels of Habitual Physical Activity]. Meditsinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala, 2017, no. 2, pp. 151–155.
11. Pal’chik A.B., Semenova I.A., Lisina E.V. Individual’nye traektorii dvizheniy v diagnostike psikhomotornogo razvitiya grudnykh detey [Individual Movement Trajectories in the Diagnosis of Psychomotor Development of Infants]. Uchenie A.A. Ukhtomskogo i sovremennaya nauka [A.A. Ukhtomsky’s Theory and Modern Science]. St. Petersburg, 2000, pp. 89–90.
12. Chuvakova T.K., Tortaeva G.S., Sagandykova E.S. Analysis of Motor Activity of Premature Newborns. J. Clin. Med. Kaz., 2017, vol. 3, no. 45 (spec. iss.), pp. 39–43. DOI: 10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00513
13. Lisina E.V. Osobennosti spontannoy dvigatel’noy aktivnosti plodov, novorozhdennykh i mladentsev pervykh mesyatsev zhizni s sindromom zaderzhki vnutriutrobnogo razvitiya [Spontaneous Motor Activity of Fetuses, Newborns and Infants with Intrauterine Growth Restriction]. St. Petersburg, 2004. 143 p.
14. Kolpakov V.V., Bespalova T.V., Bragin A.V., Lebedeva K.A., Tomilova E.A., Vesnina T.A. The Concept of Typological Variability of Physiological Individuality: II. Somatotype Heterogeneity of Population Groups Differing in Habitual Physical Activity. Hum. Physiol., 2009, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 66–73.
15. Kolpakov V.V., Tomilova E.A., Bespalova T.V., Lar’kina N.Yu., Stolbov M.V., Tkachuk A.A. Chronobiological Assessment of Habitual Physical Activity in Humans in Western Siberia. Hum. Physiol., 2016, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 203–213. DOI: 10.1134/S0362119716020092
16. Chernogrivova M.O., Tomilova E.A. Konstitutsional’nyy podkhod k fiziologicheskomu obosnovaniyu dvigatel’noy aktivnosti u detey s izbytochnoy massoy tela [The Constitutional Approach to Physiological Substantiation of Physical Activity in Overweight Children]. Meditsinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala, 2010, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 75–77.
17. Tomilova E.A., Kolpakov V.V., Bespalova T.V. Prognosticheskaya otsenka rannikh otkloneniy arterial’nogo davleniya i vydelenie grupp riska s adaptatsionno-kompensatornoy disfunktsiey detey s nizkim i vysokim urovnem privychnoy dvigatel’noy aktivnosti [Prognostic Assessment of Early Blood Pressure Abnormalities and Singling Out Risk Groups for Adaptive-Compensatory Dysfunction of Children with Low and High Levels of Habitual Physical Activity]. Tyumen, 2017. 159 p.
18. Shtork T.E., Bespalova T.V. Kompleksnaya otsenka i donozologicheskaya diagnostika giperaktivnosti u lits zrelogo vozrasta [Comprehensive Assessment and Prenosological Diagnosis of Hyperactivity in Middle-Aged People]. Farmatsevticheskaya nauka, obrazovanie i praktika: realii i perspektivy razvitiya [Pharmaceutical Science, Education and Practice: Current State and Prospects for Development]. Tyumen, 2009, pp. 253–256.
19. Bespalova T.V., Korchin V.I., Kolpakov V.V. Regional’nye osobennosti vnutripopulyatsionnogo raznoobraziya privychnoy dvigatel’noy aktivnosti i ee rol’ v otsenke fiziologicheskoy normy i donozologicheskoy diagnostiki [Regional Features of Intrapopulational Diversity of Habitual Motor Activity and Its Role in the Assessment of the Physiological Norm and Prenosological Diagnosis]. Khanty-Mansiysk, 2012. 173 p.
20. Kolpakov V.V., Shun’ko E.L., Bespalova T.V., Semenov V.V. Ontogeneticheskie podkhody k otsenke funktsional’nykh tipov konstitutsii [Ontogenetic Approaches to the Assessment of Functional Types of Constitution]. Novye issledovaniya, 2004, no. 1–2, pp. 209–210.
21. Bragin A.V., Kolpakov V.V. Kontseptual’nyy podkhod k razrabotke fundamental’nykh i prikladnykh aspektov v stomatologii [Conceptual Approach to Basic and Applied Aspects of Stomatology]. Meditsinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala, 2009, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 10–13.
22. Krivoschekov S.G., Schmerling P.M., Tataurov Y.A., Pichcurov A.M. Influence of Cold Adaptation and Phase Shift of Circadian Rhythm on Respiratory Center Sensitivity in Man. 8th International Congress of Circumpolar Health. Yukon, 1990, p. 60.
23. Shmerling P.M., Krivoshchekov S.G. Osobennosti energeticheskogo obespecheniya myshechnoy deyatel’nosti u raznykh somatotipov [Energy Support of Muscle Activity in Different Somatotypes]. Fiziologicheskiy zhurnal im. I.M. Sechenova, 1992, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 90–99.
24. Kornienko I.A., Tambovtseva R.V., Panasyuk T.V., Son’kin V.D. Individual Characteristics of Somatotype and Skeletal Muscle Power in Girls in the Age Period from 7 to 11. Hum. Physiol., 2000, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 199–203.
25. Izaak S.I., Panasyuk T.V., Tambovtseva R.V. The Constitutional Factor of a Child’s Growth and Maturation. Hum. Physiol., 2001, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 671–679.
26. Koynosov P.G., Chiryat’eva T.V., Koynosov A.P., Orlov S.A., Ionina E.V., Zhvavyy P.N., Kolomys V.E., Kurenkova I.D. Fizicheskoe razvitie detey korennykh narodov severa s razlichnym rezhimom dvigatel’noy aktivnosti [Physical Development of Children of Indigenous Peoples of the North with Different Types of Motor Activity]. Meditsinskaya nauka i obrazovanie Urala, 2016, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 62–65.
27. Kornienko I.A., Son’kin V.D., Tambovtseva R.V., Panasyuk T.V. Development of the Energetics of Muscular Exercise with Age: Summary of a 30-Year Study: IV. The Development of the Energetics of Skeletal Muscles Depending on the Somatotype. Hum. Physiol., 2007, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 742–746.
28. Tomilova E.A., Kommer A.S., Kolpakov V.V., Bespalova T.V., Bragin A.V. Vnutrigruppovaya variabel’nost’ funktsional’nykh kharakteristik somatotipov [Intragroup Variability of Somatotypes’ Functional Characteristics]. Morfologiya, 2018, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 58–63.
29. Akhmetov I.I. Molekulyarnaya genetika sporta [The Molecular Genetics of Sports]. Moscow, 2009. 268 p.