Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Phone: (818-2) 21-61-21 ABOUT JOURNAL
|
Section: Review articles Download (pdf, 2.6MB )UDC612.821DOI10.17238/issn2542-1298.2019.7.3.338AuthorsYuliya S. Dzhos*, Irina A. Men’shikova***Okkervil Paediatric Centre (Leningrad Region, Russian Federation) **Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation) Corresponding author: Irina Men’shikova, address: proezd Badigina 3, Arkhangelsk, 163000, Russian Federation; e-mail: irinamen2014@yandex.ru AbstractThe article deals with the application of neurofeedback in various diseases and disorders of the brain’s functional state among children and adults. Presentation of the brain’s bioelectric potentials allows a person to learn how to control his/her physiological functions otherwise managed unconsciously. It has been revealed that neurofeedback sessions influence the fundamental rhythmic mechanisms by changing the neuro-modulatory effects of the brain stem and the plasticity of neural networks as well as due to the formation of new neural ensembles. Changing the level and degree of EEG activity, neurofeedback training normalizes the activation mechanisms, thus improving cortical stability. Through teaching to control the central regulation mechanisms, neurofeedback sessions contribute to the stabilization of the nervous system as a whole. It plays a significant role in enhancing the functional capacity of the brain both among children and in adults. The most effective this method proved to be in epilepsy, various types of addictive disorders, sleep disorders among adults, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder in children. Moreover, it was successfully introduced into the training process of athletes. However, despite numerous studies, the questions of effective use of neurofeedback remain unanswered. In particular, there is a lack of consensus about the number, duration and frequency of neurofeedback sessions. Furthermore, it is of great importance to study the motivation and consider the subjects’ ability to understand the tasks during the sessions. Research into the dynamics of the spectral characteristics of the main rhythms during neurofeedback training and evaluation of the self-regulation strategies after the biofeedback course make it possible to work out guidelines for developing effective self-regulation skills for mental functions.Keywordsneurofeedback, electroencephalogram, voluntary regulationReferences1. Isaychev S.A. Ispol’zovanie BOS-tekhnologii v prakticheskoy psikhologii [Application of Biofeedback in Practical Psychology]. XX s”ezd Fiziologicheskogo obshchestva im. I.P. Pavlova [20th Congress of I.P. Pavlov Physiological Society]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 211–212.2. Poskotinova L.V. Vegetativnaya regulyatsiya ritma serdtsa i endokrinnyy status podrostkov i molodykh lits v usloviyakh Evropeyskogo Severa Rossii [Autonomic Heart Rhythm Regulation and Endocrine Status of Adolescents and Young People in the European North of Russia: Diss.]. Arkhangelsk, 2009. 329 p. 3. Rudakova E.V., Gribanov A.V., Pankov M.N. Vozmozhnosti BOS-treninga v korrektsii sindroma s giperaktivnost’yu [Possibilities of Biofeedback Training in the Correction of Hyperactivity Disorder]. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Ser.: Fiziologicheskie i psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki, 2007, no. 4, pp. 86–93. 4. Vartanova T.S., Smetankin A.A. Ocherk istorii razvitiya biologicheskoy obratnoy svyazi kak metoda meditsinskoy reabilitatsii [Essay on the History of the Development of Biofeedback as a Medical Rehabilitation Method]. Obshchie voprosy primeneniya metoda BOS [General Issues of Biofeedback Application]. St. Petersburg, 2008, pp. 3–19. 5. Vasilevskiy N.N., Migalovskaya N.A., Nikitina S.B., Zingerman A.M. Metod al’ternativnogo bioupravleniya s obratnoy svyaz’yu i kriterii effektivnosti treninga [Alternative Biofeedback Method and Training Effectiveness Criteria]. Bioupravlenie-2: teoriya i praktika [Biofeedback-2: Theory and Practice]. Novosibirsk, 1993, pp. 65–75. 6. Soroko S.I., Trubachev V.V. Neyrofiziologicheskie i psikhofiziologicheskie osnovy adaptivnogo bioupravleniya [Neurophysiological and Psychophysiological Bases of Adaptive Biofeedback]. St. Petersburg, 2010. 607 p. 7. Grin’-Yatsenko V.A., Kropotov Yu.D., Ponomarev V.A., Chutko L.S., Yakovenko E.A. Ispol’zovanie metoda biologicheskoy obratnoy svyazi po elektroentsefalogramme v korrektsii narusheniy vnimaniya u detey [The Use of Neurofeedback in Correcting Attention Deficit in Children]. Shtark M.B., Shvarts M. (eds.). Bioupravlenie-4: Teoriya i praktika [Biofeedback-4: Theory and Practice]. Novosibirsk, 2002, pp. 108–116. 8. Bekhtereva N.P. Zdorovyy i bol’noy mozg cheloveka [Healthy and Pathological Human Brain]. Leningrad, 1988. 262 p. 9. Anokhin P.K. Uzlovye voprosy teorii funktsional’noy sistemy [Central Issues of the Theory of Functional Systems]. Moscow, 1980. 196 p. 10. Bezrukikh M.M., Loginova E.S., Machinskaya R.I., Semenova O.A., Filippova T.A. Kompleksnaya metodika diagnostiki poznavatel’nogo razvitiya detey predshkol’nogo vozrasta i pervoklassnikov [A Comprehensive Diagnostic Technique for the Cognitive Development of Preschool Children and First-Formers]. Moscow, 2007. 124 p. 11. Zakharov V.V. Vserossiyskaya programma issledovaniy epidemiologii i terapii kognitivnykh rasstroystv v pozhilom vozraste (“Prometey”) [All-Russia Epidemiological and Therapeutic Investigation Concerning Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly (“Prometheus”)]. Nevrologicheskiy zhurnal, 2006, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 27–32. 12. Sterman M.B., Egner T. Foundation and Practice of Neurofeedback for the Treatment of Epilepsy. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2006, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21–35. 13. Walker J.E. Power Spectral Frequency and Coherence Abnormalities in Patients with Intractable Epilepsy and Their Usefulness in Long-Term Remediation of Seizures Using Neurofeedback. Clin. EEG Neurosci., 2008, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 203–205. 14. Walker J.E. Using QEEG-Guided Neurofeedback for Epilepsy Versus Standardized Protocols: Enhanced Effectiveness? Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2010, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 29–30. 15. Shtark M.B., Skok A.B. Primenenie elektroentsefalograficheskogo bioupravleniya v klinicheskoy praktike (literaturnyy obzor) [The Use of Neurofeedback in Clinical Practice (Literature Review)]. Shtark M.B., Koll R. (eds.). Bioupravlenie-3: Teoriya i praktika [Biofeedback-3: Theory and Practice]. Novosibirsk, 1998, pp. 131–139. 16. Horrell T., El-Baz A., Baruth J., Tasman A., Sokhadze G., Stewart C., Sokhadze E. Neurofeedback Effects on Evoked and Induced EEG Gamma Band Reactivity to Drug-Related Cues in Cocaine Addiction. J. Neurother., 2010, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 195–216. 17. Cherapkina L.P., Tristan V.G., Eremeev S.I. Vliyanie povtornogo kursa EEG-bioupravleniya na elektroentsefalograficheskuyu i khronobiologicheskuyu kharakteristiki funktsional’nogo sostoyaniya sportsmenov [Influence of Recurrent Course of EEG-Biofeedback Training on Encephalographic and Chronobiology Features of Functional Condition of Athletes]. Byulleten’ SO RAMN, 2004, no. 3, pp. 105–109. 18. Strizhkova T.Yu., Cherapkina L.P., Strizhkova O.Yu. Primenenie neyrobioupravleniya pri podgotovke vysokokvalifitsirovannykh sportsmenok, zanimayushchikhsya slozhnokoordinatsionnymi vidami sporta [Using of the Neurobiofeedback for Training of Highly Qualified Athletes Practicing Complex Coordination Types of Sport]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik, 2008, no. 2, pp. 148–150. 19. Cortoos A., De Valck E., Arns M., Breteler M.H.M., Cluydts R. An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Tele-Neurofeedback and Tele-Biofeedback on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Patients with Primary Insomnia. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2010, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 125–134. 20. Hammond D.C. What Is Neurofeedback: An Update. J. Neurother., 2011, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 305–336. 21. Walker J.E. QEEG-Guided Neurofeedback for Recurrent Migraine Headaches. Clin. EEG Neurosci., 2011, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 59–61. 22. Ros T., Munneke M.A., Ruge D., Gruzelier J.H., Rothwell J.C. Endogenous Control of Waking Brain Rhythms Induces Neuroplasticity in Humans. Eur. J. Neurosci., 2010, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 770–778. 23. Thompson L., Thompson M., Reid A. Neurofeedback Outcomes in Clients with Asperger’s Syndrome. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2010, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 63–81. 24. Coben R., Linden M., Myers T.E. Neurofeedback for Autistic Spectrum Disorder: A Review of the Literature. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2010, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 83–105. 25. Coben R., Myers T.E. The Relative Efficacy of Connectivity Guided and Symptom Based EEG Biofeedback for Autistic Disorders. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 2010, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 13–23. 26. Sürmeli T., Ertem A. EEG Neurofeedback Treatment of Patients with Down Syndrome. J. Neurother., 2007, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–68. 27. Sürmeli T., Ertem A. Post-WISC–R and TOVA Improvement with QEEG Guided Neurofeedback Training in Mentally Retarded: A Clinical Case Series of Behavioral Problems. Clin. EEG Neurosci., 2010, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 32–41. 28. Drechsler R. Ist Neurofeedbacktraining eine wirksame Therapiemethode zur Behandlung von ADHS? Ein Überblick über aktuelle Befunde. Z. Neuropsychol., 2011, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 131–146. 29. Lubar J.F., Shouse M.N. EEG and Behavioral Changes in a Hyperkinetic Child Concurrent with Training of the Sensorimotor Rhythm (SMR): A Preliminary Report. Biofeedback Self Regul., 1976, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 293–306. 30. Uspenskiy A.L., Subbotkina A.N. Korrektsiya sindroma defitsita vnimaniya i giperaktivnosti metodom komp’yuternogo bioupravleniya [Correction of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Using the Method of Computer Biofeedback]. Vestnik vosstanovitel’noy meditsiny, 2010, no. 4, pp. 28–31. 31. Dzhafarova O.A., Danilenko E.N. Neyrobioupravlenie v korrektsii sindroma defitsita vnimaniya i giperaktivnosti shkol’nikov [Neurobiofeedback in the Correction of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Schoolchildren]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie, 2016, no. 2, pp. 93–96. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2016-2-93-96 32. Fokina Yu.O., Pavlenko V.B., Kulichenko A.M. Vozmozhnye mekhanizmy deystviya biologicheskoy obratnoy svyazi po elektroentsefalogramme [The Possible Mechanisms of Neurofeedback Action]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Ser.: Biologiya, khimiya, 2008, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 107–116. |
Make a Submission
INDEXED IN:
|