UDC

612.821:796.01

DOI

10.37482/2687-1491-Z270

Authors

Adelia Sh. Abdrakhmanova* ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-7822
Fanis A. Mavliev* ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-7583
Andrey S. Nazarenko* ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-8395
Valeria A. Kapustinskaya* ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2704-2485
Igor A. Skiba** ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-8775

*Volga Region State University of Physical Culture, Sport and Tourism
(Kazan, Russia)
**Kazan State Medical University
(Kazan, Russia)

Corresponding author: Adelia Abdrakhmanova, address: Derevnya Universiady 35, Kazan, 420010, Russia; e-mail: adeliaabd@mail.ru

Abstract

Studies show that cognitive load can negatively affect physical performance. In everyday life, cognitive load can include smartphone use, playing video games, studying or driving a car. Athletes routinely face cognitive demands during competitions; however, it remains unclear to what extent they are resilient to cognitive loads outside of the sports context and whether such loads can affect subsequent athletic performance. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of cognitive load on athletes’ functional state. Materials and methods. The experiment was conducted at the Research Institute of Physical Culture and Sports, Volga Region State University of Physical Culture, Sport and Tourism, and involved 42 male students (mean age 21.35 ± 3.01 years): professional athletes (football, basketball, handball, belt wrestling, sambo, karate, taekwondo, swimming and hockey; n = 33) and non-athletes (n = 9). A 30-minute incongruent Stroop test was used as cognitive load. Before and after the test, the participants completed a fatigue visual analogue scale (VAS), their heart rate and blood pressure were measured. In addition, tests for simple visual-motor reaction and working memory were performed, as well as the Romberg test with eyes open and closed, two maximal effort handgrip attempts, one endurance dynamometry attempt with simultaneous recording of the electrical activity of the muscles involved, followed by the Borg CR-10 scale for perceived exertion. Results. The research demonstrated that cognitive load increases perceived exertion and negatively affects athletes’ physiological parameters, indicating the impact of cognitive fatigue on the autonomic regulation. Noteworthy, simple visual-motor reaction and working memory parameters, reflecting basic cognitive and sensorimotor functions, remained stable in athletes after cognitive load. While dynamometry showed no significant changes, a significant decrease in muscle electrical activity was observed in athletes.

Keywords

cognitive load, cognitive fatigue, isometric parameters, hand dynamometry, perceived exertion, upper limb muscles, athletes

References

1. Diamond A. Executive Functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2013, vol. 64, pp. 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
2. Furley P., Schütz L.M., Wood G. A Critical Review of Research on Executive Functions in Sport and Exercise. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 2025, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 316–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2023.2217437
3. Cao L.-Z., He H., Miao X., Chi L. The Contributions of Executive Functions to Decision-Making in Sport. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 2025, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2024.2371483
4. Kabachkova A.V., Zakharova A.N., Lalaeva G.S., Kironenko T.A., Buel’ Yu.A., Milovanova K.G., Kapilevich L.V. Izmenenie krovotoka v karotidnom basseyne u sportsmenov pri vypolnenii kognitivnoy proby [Blood Flow Changes in Carotid System in Athletes During Cognitive Test]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kul’tury, 2015, no. 11, pp. 33–35.
5. Ovchinnikova N.A., Yuzanin E.F., Medvedeva E.V., Kapilevich L.V. Bioelectrical Activity of the Brain in Athletes Under Cognitive and Physical Load. Hum. Sport Med., 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 64–72 (in Russ.).
6. Polikanova I.S., Sergeev A.V. Vliyanie dlitel’noy kognitivnoy nagruzki na parametry EEG [The Effect of Long-Term Cognitive Load on the EEG Parameters]. Natsional’nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 2014, vol. 1, no. 13, pp. 84–92.
7. Liu X., Banich M.T., Jacobson B.L., Tanabe J.L. Common and Distinct Neural Substrates of Attentional Control in an Integrated Simon and Spatial Stroop Task as Assessed by Event-Related fMRI. Neuroimage, 2004, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.033
8. Lam H.K.N., Sproule J., Phillips S.M. Future Directions in Understanding Acute and Chronic Effects of Mental Fatigue in Sports: A Commentary on Bridging Laboratory Findings and Real-World Applications. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform., 2025, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1172–1176. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0363
9. Göker Z. Fatigue in the Aviation: An Overview of the Measurements and Countermeasures. J. Aviat., 2018, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 185–194. https://doi.org/10.30518/JAV.451741
10. Holgado D., Troya E., Perales J.C., Vadillo M.A., Sanabria D. Does Mental Fatigue Impair Physical Performance? A Replication Study. Eur. J. Sport Sci., 2021, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1781265
11. Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, 1998. 104 p.
12. Stroop J.R. Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions. J. Exp. Psychol., 1935, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
13. Abdrakhmanova A.Sh., Mavliev F.A., Netreba A.I., Davletova N.Kh., Nazarenko A.S. Program for Performing the Stroop Test: Cognitive Load Test (CLT). Registration Certificate RF no. 2023669665, 2023 (in Russ.).
14. Marcora S.M., Staiano W., Manning V. Mental Fatigue Impairs Physical Performance in Humans. J. Appl. Physiol., 2009, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91324.2008
15. Gucciardi D.F., Hanton S., Gordon S., Mallett C.J., Temby P. The Concept of Mental Toughness: Tests of Dimensionality, Nomological Network, and Traitness. J. Pers., 2015, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12079
16. Aubert A.E., Seps B., Beckers F. Heart Rate Variability in Athletes. Sports Med., 2003, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 889–919. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333120-00003
17. Miki K., Yoshimoto M. Exercise-Induced Modulation of Baroreflex Control of Sympathetic Nerve Activity. Front. Neurosci., 2018, vol. 12. Art. no. 493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00493
18. Wickens C.D. Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction. Theor. Iss. Ergon. Sci., 2002, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
19. Mangin T., Pageaux B. It Is Time to Stop Using the Terminology “Passive” Fatigue. Motiv. Sci., 2024, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000375
20. Karim E., Pavel H.R., Nikanfar S., Hebri A., Roy A., Nambiappan H.R., Jaiswal A., Wylie G.R., Makedon F. Examining the Landscape of Cognitive Fatigue Detection: A Comprehensive Survey. Technologies, 2024, vol. 12, no. 3. Art. no. 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12030038