UDC

DOI

Authors

Mikhail N. Pankov¹*, Andrey B. Gudkov², Yakov S. Pestov³, Olga N. Popova⁴, Irina S. Kozhevnikova⁵

^{1, 2, 4}Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia

^{1, 3, 5}Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia

¹m.pankov@narfu.ru*, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-5751

²gudkovab@nsmu.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-0941

³yakovpes@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4010-157X

⁴popova_nsmu@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-4594

⁵kogevnikovais@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7194-9465

Abstract

Electroencephalography is an informative method for recording the electrical activity of the brain, which is widely used in physiological and clinical studies to assess the functional state of the body. In general, electroencephalography allows to identify characteristic adaptive changes and helps understand the general patterns of compensatory and adaptive responses. This review examines the use of electroencephalography to assess adaptation processes during stress, and cognitive and physical exertion. Currently, neurophysiological diagnostics of stressful conditions is based on the analysis of the main electroencephalogram rhythms: delta (1–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–14 Hz), beta (14–30 Hz), and gamma (>30 Hz), with an assessment of their spectral characteristics (amplitude, dominant frequency, index). Modern research has identified three key electrophysiological correlates of stress: decreased mediofrontal theta activity, modified delta oscillations, and frontal alpha asymmetry. Adaptation to cognitive loads is a crucial mechanism for maintaining mental performance and preventing cognitive fatigue. Electroencephalography allows for an objective assessment of the functional state of cognitive processes, tracking the dynamics of changes in fundamental brain rhythms, and identifying key neurophysiological mechanisms of central nervous system adaptation to various types of mental exercise. This is of significant importance for both fundamental research on cognitive functions and applied aspects of optimizing mental performance. The review shows that the neurophysiological mechanisms of adaptation to physical loads include various complex changes that are clearly reflected in the electroencephalogram. Thus, electroencephalography is an effective tool for assessing not only changes in the brain’s bioelectrical activity, but also the processes of adaptation and recovery during stress, and cognitive and physical exertion.

For citation: Pankov M.N., Gudkov A.B., Pestov Ya.S., Popova O.N., Kozhevnikova I.S. Application of Electroencephalography for Assessing Adaptation Processes in Humans (Review). Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2026, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 104–118. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1491-Z299

Keywords

References

1. Quigley C. Forgotten Rhythms? Revisiting the First Evidence for Rhythms in Cognition. Eur. J. Neurosci., 2022, vol. 55, no. 11–12, pp. 3266–3276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15450

2. Lindsley D.B., Field J., Magoun H.W., Hall V.E. Attention, Consciousness, Sleep and Wakefulness. Handbook of Physiology. Neurophysiology III. Washington, 1960, pp. 1553–1593.

3. Bodrov V.A. Psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy adaptatsii cheloveka [Psychological Mechanisms of Human Adaptation]. Psikhologiya adaptatsii i sotsial’naya sreda: sovremennye podkhody, problemy, perspektivy. [The Psychology of Adaptation and the Social Environment: Modern Approaches, Problems, and Prospects]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 42–61.

4. LeDoux J. The Emotional Brain, Fear, and the Amygdala. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol., 2003, vol. 23, no. 4–5, pp. 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025048802629

5. Arnsten A.F.T. Stress Weakens Prefrontal Networks: Molecular Insults to Higher Cognition. Nat. Neurosci., 2015, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1376–1385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4087

6. Craig A.D. How Do You Feel – Now? The Anterior Insula and Human Awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555

7. Torubarov F.S., Zvereva Z.F., Lukyanova S.N. EEG Indicators of the State of the Central Nervous System in Individuals with Different Levels of Psychophysiological Adaptation. Saratov J. Med. Sci. Res., 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 965–967 (in Russ.).

8. Knyazev G.G. Motivation, Emotion, and Their Inhibitory Control Mirrored in Brain Oscillations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2007, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.10.004

9. Beppi C., Violante I.R., Scott G., Sandrone S. EEG, MEG and Neuromodulatory Approaches to Explore Cognition: Current Status and Future Directions. Brain Cogn., 2021, vol. 148. Art. no. 105677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105677

10. Pfurtscheller G., Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-Related EEG/MEG Synchronization and Desynchronization: Basic Principles. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1999, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1842–1857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8

11. Leue A., Beauducel A. A Meta-Analysis of the P3 Amplitude in Tasks Requiring Deception in Legal and Social Contexts. Brain Cogn., 2019, vol. 135, no. 7. Art. no. 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.002

12. Hermans E.J., Henckens M.J.A.G., Joëls M., Fernández G. Dynamic Adaptation of Large-Scale Brain Networks in Response to Acute Stressors. Trends Neurosci., 2014, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.03.006

13. Firaux T., Tuszynski J.A., Cavaglià M. EMI Model: A Scale Free Biophysical Framework for Human Consciousness, Cognition and Behaviour. BioSystems, 2026, vol. 259. Art. no. 105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105674

14. Leonteva A.D., Zubarev A.S. Anxiety and Neurophysiological Markers: Mobile EEG Analysis. Natl. Psychol. J., 2025, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 75–85 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2025.0107

15. Friedman N.P., Robbins T.W. The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Cognitive Control and Executive Function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0

16. Fiebelkorn I.C., Kastner S. Functional Specialization in the Attention Network. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2020, vol. 71, pp. 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103429

17. Robbins T.W., Arnsten A.F.T. The Neuropsychopharmacology of Fronto-Executive Function: Monoaminergic Modulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 32, pp. 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135535

18. Popova M.A., Cheberyak M.I. Metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya neyrofiziologicheskikh kharakteristik kognitivnykh nagruzok studentov v protsesse obucheniya (obzor literatury) [Methodological Aspects of Researching the Neurophysiological Characteristics of Cognitive Loads in Students During the Learning Process (Literature Review)]. Mod. Iss. Biomed., 2024, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 96–105 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2588-0500-2024_08_04_10

19. McMorris T., Graydon J. The Effect of Exercise on Cognitive Performance in Soccer-Specific Tests. J. Sports Sci., 1997, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404197367092

20. Komarova Y., Zakharov A., Sergeeva M., Romanchuk N., Vladimirova T., Shirolapov I. Modeling Working Memory in Neurodegeneration: A Focus on EEG Methods. Diagnostics (Basel), 2025, vol. 15, no. 23. Art. no. 2992. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15232992

21. Tran Y., Craig A., Craig R., Chai R., Nguyen H. The Influence of Mental Fatigue on Brain Activity: Evidence from a Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. Psychophysiology, 2020, vol. 57, no. 5. Art. no. e13554. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13554

22. Gaillard C., De Sousa C., Amengual J., Loriette C., Ziane C., Ben Hadj Hassen S., Di Bello F., Ben Hamed S. Attentional Brain Rhythms During Prolonged Cognitive Activity. BioRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.26.445730

23. Weigard A., Angstadt M., Taxali A., Heathcote A., Heitzeg M.M., Sripada C. Flexible Adaptation of Task-Positive Brain Networks Predicts Efficiency of Evidence Accumulation. Commun. Biol., 2024, vol. 7, no. 1. Art. no. 801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06506-w

24. Adeniji K.O., Igado O.O., Olopade F.E., Femi-Akinlosotu O.M. Sleep Deprivation and Memory: A Neurobiological Perspective. IBRO Neurosci. Rep., 2026, vol. 20, pp. 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2026.01.010

25. Jia S., Liu D., Yue Y., Colzato L., Hommel B., Beste C. Periodic and Aperiodic Neural Activity Contribute to the Microgenesis of Learning from Mistakes. NeuroImage, 2025, vol. 317. Art. no. 121341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neuroimage.2025.121341

26. Ghibellini R., Meier B. The Hypnagogic State: A Brief Update. J. Sleep Res., 2023, vol. 32, no. 1. Art. no. e13719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13719

27. Wascher E., Rasch B., Sänger J., Hoffmann S., Schneider D., Rinkenauer G., Heuer H., Gutberlet I. Frontal Theta Activity Reflects Distinct Aspects of Mental Fatigue. Biol. Psychol., 2014, vol. 96, pp. 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biopsycho.2013.11.010

28. Zhozhikashvili N.A., Bakumova A.D., Bochkovskaya I.A. Al’fa- i teta-ritmy kak markery kognitivnogo usiliya [Alpha and Theta Rhythms as Markers of Cognitive Effort]. Russ. Psychol. J., 2022, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 201–219.

29. Polich J. Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2007, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 2128–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019

30. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.093008.131123

31. Apicella A., Arpaia P., Frosolone M., Moccaldi N. High-Wearable EEG-Based Distraction Detection in Motor Rehabilitation. Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1. Art. no. 5297. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84447-8

32. Bhargava Y., Kottapalli A., Baths V. Validation and Comparison of Virtual Reality and 3D Mobile Games for Cognitive Assessment against ACE-III in 82 Young Participants. Sci. Rep., 2024, vol. 14, no. 1. Art. no. 23918. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75065-1

33. Jauny G., Eustache F., Hinault T.T. M/EEG Dynamics Underlying Reserve, Resilience, and Maintenance in Aging: A Review. Front. Psychol., 2022, vol. 13. Art. no. 861973 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861973

34. Stern Y. Cognitive Reserve. Neuropsychologia, 2009, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2015–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004

35. Park D.C., Reuter-Lorenz P. The Adaptive Brain: Aging and Neurocognitive Scaffolding. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2009, vol. 60, pp. 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656

36. Steffener J., Habeck C.G., Stern Y. Age-Related Changes in Task Related Functional Network Connectivity. PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7, no. 9. Art. no. e44421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044421

37. Wiegand I., Lauritzen M.J., Osler M., Mortensen E.L., Rostrup E., Rask L., Richard N., Horwitz A., Benedek K., Vangkilde S., Petersen A. EEG Correlates of Visual Short-Term Memory in Older Age Vary with Adult Lifespan Cognitive Development. Neurobiol. Aging, 2018, vol. 62, pp. 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.10.018

38. Munro C.A., McCaul M.E., Wong D.F., Oswald L.M., Zhou Y., Brasic J., Kuwabara H., Kumar A., Alexander M., Ye W. et al. Sex Differences in Striatal Dopamine Release in Healthy Adults. Biol. Psychiatry, 2006, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 966–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.01.008

39. Tsygan V.N., Bogoslovsky M.M., Mirolyubov A.V. Elektroentsefalografiya [Electroencephalography]. Saint Petersburg, 2008. 192 p.

40. Dietrich A. Transient Hypofrontality as a Mechanism for the Psychological Effects of Exercise. Psychiatry Res., 2006, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.033

41. Ekkekakis P. Illuminating the Black Box: Investigating Prefrontal Cortical Hemodynamics During Exercise with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 2009, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 505–553. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.4.505

42. Cherapkina L.P., Tristan V.G. Osobennosti bioelektricheskoy aktivnosti golovnogo mozga sportsmenov [Features of the Bioelectric Activity of Athletes’ Brains]. Bull. South Ural State Univ. Ser. Educ. Healthc. Phys. Cult., 2011, no. 39, pp. 27–31.

43. Balioz N.V., Arkhipova E.E., Mozolevskaya N.V., Krivoshchekov S.G. Electroencephalographic Markers of CNS Functional State in Sport. Ulyanovsk Med. Biol. J., 2023, no. 3, pp. 30–48 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34014/2227-1848-2023-3-30-48

44. Cheron G., Petit G., Cheron J., Leroy A., Cebolla A., Cevallos C., Petieau M., Hoellinger T., Zarka D., Clarinval A.-M., Dan B. Brain Oscillations in Sport: Toward EEG Biomarkers of Performance. Front. Psychol., 2016, vol. 7. Art. no. 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00246

45. Visser A., Piskin D., Büchel D., Baumeister J. Electrocortical Activity During Resistance Exercises in Healthy Young Adults – a Systematic Review. Front. Sports Act. Living, 2024, vol. 6. Art. no. 1466776. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fspor.2024.1466776

46. Dirik H.B. Neurophysiological Impact of Physical Activity: EEG Differences Between Sedentary, Individual Athletes, and Team Athletes. Gazi J. Phys. Educ. Sports Sci., 2025, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.53434/ gbesbd.1793781

47. Li L., Smith D.M. Neural Efficiency in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 2021, vol. 15. Art. no. 698555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.698555

48. Cheval B., Boisgontier M.P. The Theory of Effort Minimization in Physical Activity. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., 2021, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000252

49. Zhai Z., Han L., Zhang W. Using EEG Technology to Enhance Performance Measurement in Physical Education. Front. Public Health, 2025, vol. 13. Art. no. 1551374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1551374

50. Jackson A.F., Bolger D.J. The Neurophysiological Bases of EEG and EEG Measurement: A Review for the Rest of Us. Psychophysiology, 2014, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12283